case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only carried out Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In that sense, case regulation differs from a person jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Big apple would not be decided using case legislation from California. As a substitute, The big apple courts will analyze the issue depending on binding precedent . If no previous decisions over the issue exist, Ny courts may check out precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority instead than binding authority. Other factors for example how outdated the decision is as well as closeness towards the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common regulation.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made crystal clear that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-discipline duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will consider care of all the components of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden given to any reported judgment may perhaps count on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[seven]
Because of this, only citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this kind of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving within the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is probably going to become more frustrating than it’s well worth.
The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report for the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The website law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the realized counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, except for most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. What's more, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.